<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Climate Action Epistemology Part 4: Technological Potential in the IPCC Mitigation Report	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://freedomsurvival.org/climate-action-epistemology-part-4-technological-potential-in-the-ipcc-mitigation-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://freedomsurvival.org/climate-action-epistemology-part-4-technological-potential-in-the-ipcc-mitigation-report/</link>
	<description>Social movement strategy for a sustainable and democratic society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan		</title>
		<link>https://freedomsurvival.org/climate-action-epistemology-part-4-technological-potential-in-the-ipcc-mitigation-report/#comment-1148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://freedomsurvival.org/?p=1244#comment-1148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no real foundation or previous experience with wind and solar at scale; and there are so many unknowns, one concludes it&#039;s premature to talk about a transition using those technologies. I don&#039;t feel very good about being subtly misled into believing &quot;renewables&quot; can replace fossil fuels. They say themselves we don&#039;t really know how much they can do. This is an example of stealth disinformation, hiding the truth by leaving a lot out, and carefully modulating emphasis. Most mainstream communication these days is guilty of this effect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no real foundation or previous experience with wind and solar at scale; and there are so many unknowns, one concludes it&#8217;s premature to talk about a transition using those technologies. I don&#8217;t feel very good about being subtly misled into believing &#8220;renewables&#8221; can replace fossil fuels. They say themselves we don&#8217;t really know how much they can do. This is an example of stealth disinformation, hiding the truth by leaving a lot out, and carefully modulating emphasis. Most mainstream communication these days is guilty of this effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
